Rankings · population
Countries by population density
People per square kilometer of land area. 213 countries ranked for 2024 (people/km²).
Watch it on the map →| Value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20.6K people/km² | +0.5% | = | |
| 2 | 18.5K people/km² | +4.0% | = | |
| 3 | 8,329 people/km² | +7.9% | = | |
| 4 | 7,165.8 people/km² | +4.1% | = | |
| 5 | 1,985.8 people/km² | +16.5% | = | |
| 6 | 1,805 people/km² | +33.2% | ▲ 1 | |
| 7 | 1,771.1 people/km² | +28.5% | ▼ 1 | |
| 8 | 1,333.4 people/km² | +9.9% | = | |
| 9 | 1,275 people/km² | +18.2% | ▲ 1 | |
| 10 | 1,197 people/km² | +1.7% | ▼ 1 | |
| 11 | 877.9 people/km² | +26.6% | ▲ 1 | |
| 12 | 655.4 people/km² | +1.3% | ▲ 1 | |
| 13 | 622.9 people/km² | -1.2% | ▲ 1 | |
| 14 | 600 people/km² | +1.1% | ▲ 2 | |
| 15 | 599.9 people/km² | +30.2% | ▲ 6 | |
| 16 | 568.9 people/km² | +5.9% | ▲ 2 | |
| 17 | 567.5 people/km² | -8.5% | ▼ 2 | |
| 18 | 555.2 people/km² | +2.0% | ▼ 1 | |
| 19 | 547 people/km² | +30.1% | ▲ 4 | |
| 20 | 534.4 people/km² | +6.8% | = | |
| 21 | 530.2 people/km² | +1.8% | ▼ 2 | |
| 22 | 493 people/km² | -34.2% | ▼ 11 | |
| 23 | 488 people/km² | +10.6% | ▼ 1 | |
| 24 | 463.5 people/km² | +21.2% | ▲ 1 | |
| 25 | 462.2 people/km² | +21.7% | ▲ 1 | |
| 26 | 427.2 people/km² | +13.5% | ▲ 1 | |
| 27 | 388.9 people/km² | +5.3% | ▲ 1 | |
| 28 | 388.5 people/km² | +11.6% | ▲ 4 | |
| 29 | 371 people/km² | +1.3% | = | |
| 30 | 361.1 people/km² | -10.7% | ▼ 6 | |
| 31 | 354.3 people/km² | +6.9% | ▲ 3 | |
| 32 | 351.3 people/km² | +0.1% | ▼ 2 | |
| 33 | 340.7 people/km² | +1.5% | = | |
| 34 | 340.1 people/km² | -2.6% | ▼ 3 | |
| 35 | 326 people/km² | +17.3% | ▲ 5 | |
| 36 | 322.2 people/km² | +10.1% | ▲ 2 | |
| 37 | 310.2 people/km² | +23.7% | ▲ 10 | |
| 38 | 310.1 people/km² | +1.2% | ▼ 2 | |
| 39 | 305.9 people/km² | +2.9% | ▼ 2 | |
| 40 | 299.9 people/km² | -2.7% | ▼ 5 | |
| 41 | 294.7 people/km² | +3.2% | ▼ 2 | |
| 42 | 286.4 people/km² | +7.2% | ▲ 2 | |
| 43 | 274.8 people/km² | +33.6% | ▲ 13 | |
| 44 | 272.7 people/km² | +27.5% | ▲ 8 | |
| 45 | 266.8 people/km² | +1.7% | = | |
| 46 | 265.5 people/km² | +33.7% | ▲ 15 | |
| 47 | 263 people/km² | +21.7% | ▲ 4 | |
| 48 | 262.2 people/km² | +1.6% | ▼ 2 | |
| 49 | 261.4 people/km² | +19.0% | ▲ 1 | |
| 50 | 258.7 people/km² | -6.2% | ▼ 8 | |
| 51 | 255.5 people/km² | +25.2% | ▲ 7 | |
| 52 | 252.8 people/km² | +8.6% | ▼ 4 | |
| 53 | 249.4 people/km² | +37.4% | ▲ 11 | |
| 54 | 248.7 people/km² | +32.8% | ▲ 9 | |
| 55 | 245.4 people/km² | +19.7% | ▲ 2 | |
| 56 | 239 people/km² | +3.0% | ▼ 7 | |
| 57 | 237.1 people/km² | +11.1% | ▼ 4 | |
| 58 | 235 people/km² | -12.1% | ▼ 15 | |
| 59 | 229.7 people/km² | +30.3% | ▲ 7 | |
| 60 | 227.9 people/km² | +9.9% | ▼ 5 | |
| 61 | 220.1 people/km² | +4.1% | ▼ 7 | |
| 62 | 213 people/km² | +5.6% | ▼ 2 | |
| 63 | 207.4 people/km² | -25.0% | ▼ 22 | |
| 64 | 206.8 people/km² | +7.2% | ▼ 2 | |
| 65 | 199.4 people/km² | -2.3% | ▼ 6 | |
| 66 | 179.5 people/km² | -0.9% | ▼ 1 | |
| 67 | 175.1 people/km² | +11.6% | = | |
| 68 | 171.8 people/km² | +17.4% | ▲ 3 | |
| 69 | 165.9 people/km² | +16.5% | ▲ 4 | |
| 70 | 161.4 people/km² | +4.2% | ▼ 2 | |
| 71 | 154.7 people/km² | +36.3% | ▲ 14 | |
| 72 | 154.6 people/km² | +21.2% | ▲ 7 | |
| 73 | 151.3 people/km² | +22.8% | ▲ 9 | |
| 74 | 150.1 people/km² | +2.7% | ▼ 2 | |
| 75 | 149.8 people/km² | +8.6% | = | |
| 76 | 149.4 people/km² | +5.9% | ▼ 2 | |
| 77 | 147 people/km² | +13.0% | ▲ 1 | |
| 78 | 147 people/km² | -0.1% | ▼ 8 | |
| 79 | 144.7 people/km² | -2.3% | ▼ 10 | |
| 80 | 141.3 people/km² | +3.7% | ▼ 3 | |
| 81 | 140.3 people/km² | +2.1% | ▼ 5 | |
| 82 | 134.4 people/km² | +21.7% | ▲ 7 | |
| 83 | 130.2 people/km² | +2.4% | ▼ 3 | |
| 84 | 130.1 people/km² | +31.4% | ▲ 14 | |
| 85 | 128.3 people/km² | +31.2% | ▲ 15 | |
| 86 | 127.2 people/km² | +3.4% | ▼ 3 | |
| 87 | 123.4 people/km² | +7.0% | ▼ 3 | |
| 88 | 119.7 people/km² | +25.6% | ▲ 13 | |
| 89 | 119.4 people/km² | -3.8% | ▼ 8 | |
| 90 | 117.7 people/km² | +30.6% | ▲ 16 | |
| 91 | 117.1 people/km² | +19.5% | ▲ 8 | |
| 92 | 116.7 people/km² | +2.8% | ▼ 6 | |
| 93 | 112.8 people/km² | +0.1% | ▼ 5 | |
| 94 | 111.2 people/km² | +7.3% | ▼ 1 | |
| 95 | 111.1 people/km² | +10.8% | ▲ 1 | |
| 96 | 108.2 people/km² | +15.8% | ▲ 8 | |
| 97 | 107.6 people/km² | +1.6% | ▼ 5 | |
| 98 | 106.1 people/km² | +26.0% | ▲ 12 | |
| 99 | 105.8 people/km² | -2.5% | ▼ 9 | |
| 100 | 105.7 people/km² | +3.2% | ▼ 6 | |
| 101 | 104.8 people/km² | -2.7% | ▼ 10 | |
| 102 | 101.5 people/km² | +8.7% | ▲ 1 | |
| 103 | 100.4 people/km² | +30.2% | ▲ 16 | |
| 104 | 99.9 people/km² | +14.6% | ▲ 3 | |
| 105 | 97.8 people/km² | +5.3% | = | |
| 106 | 97.2 people/km² | +20.1% | ▲ 7 | |
| 107 | 96.9 people/km² | -14.6% | ▼ 20 | |
| 108 | 96.8 people/km² | +19.5% | ▲ 4 | |
| 109 | 96.1 people/km² | +30.7% | ▲ 14 | |
| 110 | 94.2 people/km² | +18.5% | ▲ 5 | |
| 111 | 88.2 people/km² | -6.0% | ▼ 9 | |
| 112 | 87.8 people/km² | +11.0% | ▲ 5 | |
| 113 | 86.8 people/km² | -14.2% | ▼ 18 | |
| 114 | 86.1 people/km² | +29.3% | ▲ 16 | |
| 115 | 85.3 people/km² | +11.4% | ▲ 5 | |
| 116 | 83.5 people/km² | -16.1% | ▼ 19 | |
| 117 | 83.5 people/km² | +7.6% | ▲ 1 | |
| 118 | 82.9 people/km² | +19.5% | ▲ 9 | |
| 119 | 82.8 people/km² | -4.3% | ▼ 11 | |
| 120 | 80.7 people/km² | -4.5% | ▼ 11 | |
| 121 | 80 people/km² | +0.5% | ▼ 7 | |
| 122 | 79 people/km² | +8.8% | ▲ 2 | |
| 123 | 78.4 people/km² | +10.9% | ▲ 2 | |
| 124 | 78.3 people/km² | +26.5% | ▲ 11 | |
| 125 | 78.3 people/km² | +15.8% | ▲ 4 | |
| 126 | 77.6 people/km² | +36.6% | ▲ 13 | |
| 127 | 77 people/km² | +12.4% | ▲ 1 | |
| 128 | 76.9 people/km² | +34.2% | ▲ 10 | |
| 129 | 76.3 people/km² | +25.7% | ▲ 8 | |
| 130 | 75.2 people/km² | -7.7% | ▼ 19 | |
| 131 | 73 people/km² | +13.0% | ▲ 3 | |
| 132 | 72.3 people/km² | -4.9% | ▼ 11 | |
| 133 | 72.3 people/km² | +9.4% | ▼ 2 | |
| 134 | 69.1 people/km² | -8.0% | ▼ 12 | |
| 135 | 67.5 people/km² | +35.3% | ▲ 10 | |
| 136 | 67.3 people/km² | +9.3% | = | |
| 137 | 66.7 people/km² | +2.5% | ▼ 4 | |
| 138 | 65.4 people/km² | +30.0% | ▲ 4 | |
| 139 | 65.3 people/km² | -17.8% | ▼ 23 | |
| 140 | 61.8 people/km² | -11.2% | ▼ 14 | |
| 141 | 61.6 people/km² | +31.9% | ▲ 7 | |
| 142 | 60.9 people/km² | +16.0% | ▼ 2 | |
| 143 | 60 people/km² | +28.5% | ▲ 6 | |
| 144 | 59.3 people/km² | -9.0% | ▼ 12 | |
| 145 | 58.3 people/km² | +23.0% | ▲ 1 | |
| 146 | 56.4 people/km² | +12.8% | ▼ 2 | |
| 147 | 54.9 people/km² | +28.9% | ▲ 7 | |
| 148 | 52.8 people/km² | +15.3% | ▲ 4 | |
| 149 | 50.7 people/km² | +1.0% | ▼ 6 | |
| 150 | 50.4 people/km² | +16.4% | ▲ 3 | |
| 151 | 49.1 people/km² | +33.1% | ▲ 7 | |
| 152 | 48.2 people/km² | +39.3% | ▲ 10 | |
| 153 | 47.7 people/km² | +13.6% | ▲ 2 | |
| 154 | 46.4 people/km² | +0.0% | ▼ 3 | |
| 155 | 46.1 people/km² | -1.7% | ▼ 8 | |
| 156 | 45 people/km² | -3.4% | ▼ 6 | |
| 157 | 44 people/km² | +34.1% | ▲ 7 | |
| 158 | 43 people/km² | +17.2% | ▲ 1 | |
| 159 | 40.1 people/km² | +5.0% | ▼ 2 | |
| 160 | 39.9 people/km² | +15.0% | ▲ 1 | |
| 161 | 38.5 people/km² | +0.0% | ▼ 5 | |
| 162 | 37.7 people/km² | +22.4% | ▲ 4 | |
| 163 | 37.2 people/km² | +6.6% | ▼ 3 | |
| 164 | 33.7 people/km² | +16.2% | ▲ 4 | |
| 165 | 32.2 people/km² | -6.1% | ▼ 2 | |
| 166 | 32.1 people/km² | +6.3% | ▲ 1 | |
| 167 | 30.4 people/km² | +39.4% | ▲ 8 | |
| 168 | 30.3 people/km² | +42.3% | ▲ 9 | |
| 169 | 30 people/km² | -6.3% | ▼ 4 | |
| 170 | 29.3 people/km² | +14.5% | ▼ 1 | |
| 171 | 29.3 people/km² | +33.2% | ▲ 3 | |
| 172 | 28.7 people/km² | +34.1% | ▲ 4 | |
| 173 | 27 people/km² | +29.8% | ▲ 6 | |
| 174 | 26.9 people/km² | +26.3% | ▲ 4 | |
| 175 | 26.7 people/km² | +13.6% | ▼ 2 | |
| 176 | 26.6 people/km² | +10.4% | ▼ 6 | |
| 177 | 26 people/km² | +9.2% | ▼ 5 | |
| 178 | 25.4 people/km² | +6.3% | ▼ 7 | |
| 179 | 23.4 people/km² | +24.5% | ▲ 3 | |
| 180 | 21.3 people/km² | +40.1% | ▲ 11 | |
| 181 | 20.8 people/km² | +8.3% | ▼ 1 | |
| 182 | 20.1 people/km² | +35.8% | ▲ 10 | |
| 183 | 20.1 people/km² | +16.9% | ▲ 2 | |
| 184 | 19.7 people/km² | +19.4% | ▲ 2 | |
| 185 | 19.4 people/km² | +1.0% | ▼ 4 | |
| 186 | 18.9 people/km² | +6.2% | ▼ 2 | |
| 187 | 18.5 people/km² | +26.7% | ▲ 6 | |
| 188 | 18.5 people/km² | +2.8% | ▼ 5 | |
| 189 | 18.3 people/km² | +19.6% | = | |
| 190 | 17.5 people/km² | +14.4% | = | |
| 191 | 17.1 people/km² | +32.6% | ▲ 5 | |
| 192 | 16.7 people/km² | +6.4% | ▼ 5 | |
| 193 | 16.4 people/km² | +24.2% | ▲ 2 | |
| 194 | 16.1 people/km² | +42.5% | ▲ 4 | |
| 195 | 15.9 people/km² | +23.3% | ▲ 2 | |
| 196 | 15.8 people/km² | +2.6% | ▼ 8 | |
| 197 | 15.3 people/km² | +8.5% | ▼ 3 | |
| 198 | 11.4 people/km² | +14.0% | ▲ 1 | |
| 199 | 9.9 people/km² | +28.6% | ▲ 2 | |
| 200 | 8.8 people/km² | +0.0% | = | |
| 201 | 8.6 people/km² | +16.2% | ▲ 1 | |
| 202 | 7.6 people/km² | +15.2% | ▲ 1 | |
| 203 | 5 people/km² | +35.1% | ▲ 5 | |
| 204 | 4.7 people/km² | +17.5% | = | |
| 205 | 4.4 people/km² | +15.8% | = | |
| 206 | 4.2 people/km² | +13.5% | ▲ 1 | |
| 207 | 4 people/km² | +11.1% | ▲ 2 | |
| 208 | 3.9 people/km² | +2.6% | ▼ 2 | |
| 209 | 3.8 people/km² | +15.2% | ▲ 1 | |
| 210 | 3.7 people/km² | +32.1% | ▲ 2 | |
| 211 | 3.5 people/km² | +12.9% | = | |
| 212 | 2.3 people/km² | +21.1% | ▲ 1 | |
| 213 | 0.1 people/km² | +0.0% | ▲ 1 |
A value looks wrong? – we check every report.